Cursor vs Supermaven
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and quality scores.
92Quality
Cursor
AI-first code editor built on VS Code that integrates powerful AI coding capabilities directly into the editing experience.
View DetailsVS
80Quality
Supermaven
Ultra-fast AI code completion that processes 300K tokens of context for the most relevant suggestions.
View Details| Feature | Cursor | Supermaven |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Score | 92 | 80 |
| Pricing | $0 free (limited) / $20/mo Pro / $40/mo Business | Free basic / $10/mo Pro |
| Monthly Visits | 15M | 2M |
| User Rating | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Launched | 2023 | 2024 |
| Free Plan | Yes | Yes |
| API Available | No | No |
| Platforms | macos, windows, linux | vscode, jetbrains, neovim |
| Key Features | ai-code-completion, codebase-chat, multi-file-editing, natural-language-editing, docs-reference, vscode-compatible | code-completion, large-context, fast-inference |
Which is better: Cursor or Supermaven?
Cursor has a higher quality score (92 vs 80), indicating better overall quality and user satisfaction. Cursor is freemium ($0 free (limited) / $20/mo Pro / $40/mo Business) while Supermaven is freemium (Free basic / $10/mo Pro).